1887

Harmful Tax Practices – 2019 Peer Review Reports on the Exchange of Information on Tax Rulings

Inclusive Framework on BEPS: Action 5

image of Harmful Tax Practices – 2019 Peer Review Reports on the Exchange of Information on Tax Rulings

BEPS Action 5 is one of the four minimum standards which all members of the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on BEPS have committed to implement. One part of the Action 5 minimum standard is the transparency framework for compulsory spontaneous exchange of information on certain tax rulings which, in the absence of transparency, could give rise to BEPS concerns. Over 130 jurisdictions have joined the Inclusive Framework and take part in the peer review to assess their compliance with the transparency framework.

Specific terms of reference and a methodology have been agreed for the peer reviews to assess a jurisdiction’s implementation of the minimum standard. The review of the transparency framework assesses jurisdictions against the terms of reference which focus on five key elements: i) information gathering process, ii) exchange of information, iii) confidentiality of the information received; iv) statistics on the exchanges on rulings; and v) transparency on certain aspects of intellectual property regimes. The reviews of confidentiality of the information received defer to the work of the Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes and the outcomes of that work are not published. Recommendations are issued where improvements are needed to meet the minimum standard.

This report reflects the outcome of the annual peer review of the implementation of the Action 5 minimum standard and covers 124 jurisdictions. It assesses implementation for the 1 January - 31 December 2019 period.

Anglais

Panama

As of 2019, Panama cannot legally issue any type of rulings within the scope of the transparency framework. In the prior years, Panama could legally issue one type of ruling within the scope of the transparency framework: rulings related to preferential regimes. With respect to the following preferential regime: Multinational Companies Headquarters’ regime (i.e. MHQ/SEM). These rulings are known as “fiscal agreements”. Law 57 of 2018, entered into force on 1 January 2019, repealed the provision that included the possibility for Multinational headquarters (MHQ) Licensed Companies to obtain a fiscal agreement. Therefore as of 2019, Panama cannot legally issue any type of rulings within the scope of the transparency framework. In practice, Panama issued only one past ruling within the scope of the transparency framework.

Anglais

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error