1887
/search?value51=igo%2Foecd&value6=&sortDescending=false&sortDescending=false&value5=&value53=status%2F50+OR+status%2F100&value52=&value7=&value2=country%2Fvn&option7=&value4=&option5=&value3=&option6=&publisherId=%2Fcontent%2Figo%2Foecd&option3=&option52=&sortField=prism_publicationDate&sortField=prism_publicationDate&option4=&option53=pub_contentStatus&option51=pub_igoId&option2=pub_countryId

La restructuration des entreprises publiques a été plus rapide au Viêt Nam que dans d’autres pays comme, par exemple, la Chine et l’Inde. Le gouvernement a resserré les contraintes budgétaires imposées aux entreprises publiques au moment où il procédait à une libéralisation des prix. Un nombre non négligeable de petites entreprises publiques ont été liquidées peu après le début des réformes, mais d’autres ont réussi à s’adapter en adoptant diverses mesures de réduction des coûts, dont des licenciements de grande ampleur. Le gouvernement a mis en place un filet de sécurité comprenant des indemnités de licenciement et des programmes de préretraite qui, en sus du jeu normal des départs, ont permis de réduire la main-d’œuvre employée dans les entreprises publiques de pratiquement 1 million de personnes en moins de dix ans. Les systèmes adoptés reposant largement sur le volontariat, ils ont sans doute provoqué des phénomènes d’antisélection et eu un coût plus élevé que nécessaire, mais ...

Hormis leur poids démographique et le niveau de leur PIB, la Chine et le Viet Nam ont de nombreux points communs. Toutes deux sont des économies en transition d’un système socialiste à planification centralisée vers l’économie de marché. Toutes deux étaient des sociétés largement paysannes à l’aube des réformes dont l’un des premiers acquis importants a été la libération des forces productives de l’agriculture. De fait, l’amélioration rapide des niveaux de vie en milieu rural compte parmi les succès remarquables obtenus dans les deux pays.

S’agissant du développement industriel, les différences de résultats postérieurs aux réformes sont au contraire plus marquées que les similitudes. L’industrie a rapidement progressé dans les deux cas, beaucoup plus en moyenne que l’agriculture. Toutefois, le moteur de cette croissance diffère dans les deux pays. En Chine, ce sont les entreprises villageoises et rurales — à propriété d’abord collective puis, plus récemment, privée — qui ont tiré la ...

La réforme est au Viet Nam un processus de longue haleine. Engagée en 1979, elle a connu jusqu’en 1986 des avancées et des reculs, et une soudaine accélération en 1989-91. Depuis, elle progresse lentement, freinée par le durcissement des positions (favorables ou hostiles à une poursuite de la libéralisation) en fonction des intérêts en jeu. Les opportunités et les incitations nouvelles résultant de la réforme sont suffisamment importantes pour empêcher tout retour en arrière de grande ampleur, mais il semble que les futures avancées dépendront pour une large part de l’apparition de crises. De fait, les décideurs ont soutenu la réforme dans les périodes où une crise a sérieusement compromis la croissance, afin de restaurer leur légitimité. Dans les périodes plus fastes au contraire, des divergences apparaissent sur les risques à long terme de la réforme et la manière d’y répondre ...

  1. The Vietnamese economy was in the doldrums in the 1980s and until a certain progress had been made in the context of Doi Moi there was little incentive for businesses to invest. The following reasons are commonly given for the sluggish economic activity: a lack of appropriate infrastructure (causing market disconnectedness even within the country); weak links to the world market; a shortage of skilled labour and managerial capacity; and an inefficient or business unfriendly public administration. ODA to Vietnam was allocated in such a way as to remedy these obstacles and the donors’ well designed strategies are seen as a major factor behind the success of ODA.
  1. National ownership, an important feature of ODA programmes, has mostly been strong in ODA to Vietnam. Most of the activities of the past were closely aligned with the Vietnamese government’s development priorities. It should nevertheless be recognised that some ODA projects have aroused little enthusiasm among public ...

Over the past few years, the Vietnamese economy has enjoyed impressive growth rates. The country issued its first sovereign bond in 2005 with a total face value of USD (United States dollars) 750 million (which was sold out in the US, having been over-subscribed by a factor of four times). The investment environment has been good with increasing interest in both direct and indirect foreign investment. This positive picture seems to have made people overly optimistic and insufficiently cautious about the risk of a potential downturn in the economy.

During the 1990s, a large number of countries embarked on fundamental economic policy reforms. Centrally planned economies in Eastern Europe and East Asia, as well as highly protected and inward-looking economies like India and Brazil, were eager to reduce government involvement in economic decision-making in order to ensure macroeconomic stability and open up to international trade and capital flows. Different countries adopted different approaches and sequences of reform, which led to different policy outcomes. These experiences provide fertile ground for the political economy studies of economic reform. They provide considerable material on critical factors, like the timing, economic necessity, and political challenges of reforms.

Rice production and prices appears in OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2009.

Français

Production rizicole et prix du riz est issu de Perspectives agricoles de l'OCDE et de la FAO 2009 (chapitre 6).

Anglais

This publication presents the results of the first OECD investment policy review of Vietnam. It finds that the progress Vietnam has achieved in less than two decades in putting into place a legal framework and implementing policies that mobilise private investment, including international direct investment, to support economic growth and the prosperity of Vietnam’s citizens has been remarkable. Starting from a situation in which the economy was essentially closed to private and international investment, Vietnam is now considered to be one of the very attractive economies in the world for investment.

Français

In the last few years, Viet Nam has emerged as one of the world’s leading destinations for foreign direct investment, fuelled by the country’s accession to the WTO in 2006, a strong and stable growth rate and an ambitious reform program, which is very much welcomed by foreign investors.

Français

In 1987, early in the process of transition to a more market-oriented economy, the Vietnamese National Assembly adopted the Law on Foreign Investment. Follow-up steps have been taken in the past two decades to encourage, protect and improve the quality of foreign investment. Such efforts resulted in strong investment flows in the mid-1990s (see Figure 2.1). Due to the Asian financial crisis, net foreign investment inflows dropped significantly in 1997, but began to grow again in 2001. Since 2006, there has been a major increase in the level of FDI in Viet Nam. Disbursed FDI in 2007 totalled USD 8 billion, and estimates from Viet Nam’s Foreign Investment Agency show that disbursements totaled USD 11.5 billion in 2008. Foreign direct investment as a percentage of total investment has increased also recently reached and exceeded the pre-Asian financial crisis levels, as FDI accounted for 30% of total investment in Viet Nam in 2008. Registered FDI in Viet Nam in 2008 totaled USD 71.7 billion.

Français

After more than two decades since the launch of the country’s renovation strategy (1986 – 2009), Viet Nam has made an extensive effort to establish its legal framework and implement policies to mobilise investment from the private sector, including international investment, to stimulate economic growth and improve the standard of living of the Vietnamese people. Throughout this period, the Vietnamese economy has been transformed from a centrally planned model to a market-based one, featuring a dynamic private economic sector developing side by side with the state-owned sector for the good of the economy. Huge domestic economic resources have been unleashed. The economy has gone through important changes, both in quantity and quality. It has led to impressive growth of the private sector and to large inflows of foreign investment. Viet Nam is now seen as one of the most attractive destinations for foreign direct investment (FDI) FDI in the world, particularly for FDI from Asian and most developed countries as the figures for 2007-2008 clearly show.

Français

This section evaluates Viet Nam’s reform efforts and provides an anatomy of the regulatory framework for investment based on the general matrix of the Policy Framework for Investment (PFI) (see Box 3.1).1 This assessment, as a cooperative endeavour, builds upon Viet Nam’s self-evaluation under the PFI. It focuses on the first four chapters and part of Chapters 9 of the PFI relating to investment policies, investment promotion and facilitation, trade policies, competition policies, tax policies and development of the service sector.

Français

This publication presents the results of the first Policy Framework for Investment assessment of Viet Nam. This assessment is the product of a joint collaborative effort between Viet Nam and the OECD. It particularly reflects contributions by an interagency team in the Vietnamese government under the leadership of the Ministry for Planning and Investment.

Français

The position of Vietnamese women has improved since the 1950s. In 2006, the National Assembly passed the country’s first Law on Gender Equality. According to the US Department of State, this law aims to address a range of issues (such as wage gaps) and eliminate discrimination based on gender.

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error