Benin

142. Benin can legally issue the following one type of rulings within the scope of the transparency framework: permanent establishment rulings.

Past rulings (ToR I.A.1.1, I.A.1.2, I.A.2.1, I.A.2.2)

143. For Benin, past rulings are any tax rulings within scope that are issued either (i) on or after 1 January 2015 but before 1 April 2017; and (ii) on or after 1 January 2012 but before 1 January 2015, provided they were still in effect as at 1 January 2015. Benin issued no past rulings within the scope of the transparency framework. As such, there was no need to identify potential exchange jurisdictions.

Future rulings (ToR I.A.1.1, I.A.1.2, I.A.2.1)

144. For Benin, future rulings are any tax rulings within scope that are issued on or after 1 April 2017.

145. In the prior years’ peer review reports, Benin indicated that there were no processes in place for the record keeping of rulings for the purposes of the transparency framework. It was also noted that Benin intended to implement guidelines to ensure the necessary information to meet the requirements of the transparency framework is required in all cases. Therefore, Benin was recommended to finalise its information gathering process for identifying all relevant rulings and potential exchange jurisdictions, as soon as possible.

146. During the year in review, no additional steps to finalise its information gathering process were taken, and therefore the prior years’ recommendation remains in place.

Review and supervision (ToR I.A.3)

147. In the prior years’ peer review reports, it was determined that Benin did not yet have a review and supervision mechanism under the transparency framework. Therefore, Benin was recommended to put in place a review and supervision mechanism as soon as possible. Benin was in the process of considering the implementation of a review and supervision mechanism for ensuring implementation of the transparency framework. During the year in review, no additional steps were taken, and therefore the prior year recommendation remains.

Conclusion on section A

148. Benin is recommended to finalise its information gathering process for identifying all relevant rulings and all potential exchange jurisdictions, with a review and supervision mechanism, as soon as possible (ToR I.A).

Legal basis for spontaneous exchange of information (ToR II.B.1, II.B.2)

149. Benin is still in the process of putting in place the necessary domestic legal basis to exchange information spontaneously.

150. Benin has international agreements permitting spontaneous exchange of information, including: (i) the Multilateral Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters: Amended by the 2010 Protocol (OECD/Council of Europe, 2011[2]) (“the Convention”) and (ii) bilateral agreements in force with 9 jurisdictions1. Benin signed the Convention in 27 November 2019 and deposited its instrument of ratification on 24 January 2023. The Convention entered into force on 1 May 2023 and will have effect for administrative assistance related to taxable periods beginning on or after 1 January 2024.

Completion and exchange of templates (ToR II.B.3, II.B.4, II.B.5, II.B.6, II.B.7)

151. In the prior years’ peer review reports, it was determined that Benin was developing a process to complete the templates on relevant rulings, to make them available to the Competent Authority for exchange of information, and to exchange them with relevant jurisdictions.

152. During the year in review, no additional steps were taken, and therefore the prior year recommendation remains.

153. As no exchanges were required to take place for the year in review, no data on the timeliness of exchanges can be reported.

Conclusion on section B

154. Benin is recommended to put in place a domestic legal framework allowing spontaneous exchange of information on rulings and to continue its efforts to complete the templates for all relevant rulings and to ensure that the exchanges of information on rulings occur as soon as possible (ToR II.B).

155. As no rulings were issued, no statistics can be reported.

156. Benin does not offer an intellectual property regime for which transparency requirements under the Action 5 Report (OECD, 2015[3]) were imposed.

References

[1] OECD (2021), BEPS Action 5 on Harmful Tax Practices - Terms of Reference and Methodology for the Conduct of the Peer Reviews of the Action 5 Transparency Framework, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://www.oecd.org/tax/beps/beps-action-5-harmful-tax-practices-peer-review-transparency-framework.pdf.

[3] OECD (2015), Countering Harmful Tax Practices More Effectively, Taking into Account Transparency and Substance, Action 5 - 2015 Final Report, OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264241190-en.

[2] OECD/Council of Europe (2011), The Multilateral Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters: Amended by the 2010 Protocol, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264115606-en.

Note

← 1. Participating jurisdictions to the Convention are available here: www.oecd.org/tax/exchange-of-tax-information/convention-on-mutual-administrative-assistance-in-tax-matters.htm. Benin also has bilateral agreement with France and Norway and multilateral agreements with Burkina Faso, Cabo Verde, Cote d’Ivoire, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea-Bissau, Mali, Niger, Nigeria, Senegal and Togo within WAEMU and ECOWAS.

Legal and rights

This document, as well as any data and map included herein, are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. Extracts from publications may be subject to additional disclaimers, which are set out in the complete version of the publication, available at the link provided.

© OECD 2023

The use of this work, whether digital or print, is governed by the Terms and Conditions to be found at https://www.oecd.org/termsandconditions.