1887

Perspectives on Decentralisation and Rural-Urban Linkages in Korea

image of Perspectives on Decentralisation and Rural-Urban Linkages in Korea

The economic development of Korea is widely considered as a success story. Yet, as the country joins the ranks of the world’s most advanced economies, its rapid pace of development has not fully reached every part of its territory. The pace of urbanisation, particularly around Seoul, has placed mounting pressure on the capital’s quality of life, while in rural regions the country’s success has felt distant. To address these regional disparities, successive governments have pursued a policy of balanced national development, with major initiatives aimed at spreading economic opportunities throughout the country while at the same time transferring authority and resources to regional and local governments, to increasingly empower them to navigate their own path forward. This study takes stock of these efforts in the context of rural development and finds evidence of progress in several areas, yet opportunities remain in others. The study includes advice and recommendations on multi-level governance, rural-urban linkages and other issues drawn from the experience of OECD countries on how Korea’s efforts in pursuit of inclusive growth may be further strengthened to improve the well-being of the country's rural regions.

English

Trends, opportunities and challenges in rural Korea

Chapter 2 provides a diagnosis of the performance of rural regions as compared to OECD trends. It first examines demographic patterns in rural Korea, focusing on population levels, growth rates and elderly dependency ratios, and how these influence overall settlement structures. The chapter then benchmarks the performance of Korean rural regions, examining trends in gross domestic product (GDP) per capita and productivity. This section also examines the main sectors of specialisation in rural Korea. The chapter finally examines several dimensions of well-being against OECD trends. In order to draw international comparisons, this chapter makes use of the OECD regional typology, the OECD regional definition based on access to cities and the OECD functional urban areas definition (FUAs), as these apply a consistent definition across OECD countries.

English

Graphs

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error