Reader’s Guide
Financing SMEs and Entrepreneurs 2018: An OECD Scoreboard monitors SMEs’ and entrepreneurs’ access to finance over the period 2007-16. Based on data collected for the country profiles and information from demand-side surveys, this report includes indicators on debt, equity and asset-based finance, as well as on financing framework conditions, complemented by information on recent public and private initiatives to support SME access to finance. Taken together, these indicators form a comprehensive framework for policy makers and other stakeholders to evaluate the financing needs of SMEs and entrepreneurs and to determine whether they are being met. This report also constitutes a valuable tool to support the design and evaluation of policy measures, and to monitor the implications of financial reforms on access to finance and financing conditions for SMEs more generally.
This sixth edition presents detailed profiles for 43 countries: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Chile, the People’s Republic of China, Colombia, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Kazakhstan, Korea, Latvia, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, the Russian Federation, Serbia, the Slovak Republic, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Thailand, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States.
Indicators
SME and entrepreneurship financing trends are monitored through core indicators, listed in Table 1, selected on the criteria of usefulness, availability, feasibility and timeliness (see Annex A for a detailed description). In detail, the core indicators describe and monitor the following key dimensions.
Data collection
The scoreboard data are provided by experts designated by participating countries. Most of the indicators are derived from supply-side data provided by financial institutions, statistical offices and other government agencies. This is supplemented by national and regional demand-side surveys in order to provide a more comprehensive view of the evolution in financing trends and needs. Indicators cover access to finance for employer firms, that is, for SMEs which have at least one employee, and are operating a non-financial business. The data in the present edition cover the period 2007 to 2016, assessing trends over the medium term, both in the pre-crisis period (2007), the financial crisis (2008 and 2009) and the period afterwards. Specific attention is placed on developments occurring in 2015, 2016 and the first half of 2017. In addition, information on government policies to ease SMEs’ access to finance is also collected on a systematic basis.
The published print version includes a chapter on emerging trends in SME and entrepreneurship finance, drawing on information provided by participating countries, a thematic chapter, focusing for this edition on fostering markets of alternative finance instruments for SMEs, annexes, and a two-page snapshot for every participating country. This snapshot summarises the state of play regarding SME access to finance in each country, while the full country profiles will be available on the OECD website only.
Cross-country comparability
At the individual country level, the scoreboard provides a coherent picture of SMEs' access to finance over time and monitors changing conditions for SME financing, as well as the impact of policies. There are limits to possible cross country comparisons, however. Firstly, the statistical definition of an SME differs among participating countries; while the European Union definition is the most commonly used, participating countries outside of the Union usually define an SME differently, which complicates cross country comparisons (see Annex A for detailed definitions of SMEs across participating countries).
In addition, differences in definition and coverage for indicators hamper comparability, with a number of countries, in which it is not possible to adhere to the “preferred definition” of the core indicators. A proxy has been adopted in these instances. For this reason, all country profiles include a table, which provides the definition adopted for each indicator and a reference to the data source. Despite these limitations, it is still possible to compare general trends across countries, though, as the differences in the exact composition of the single indicator are muted when evaluating rates of change.
Methodological advances and recommendations for data improvements
There are important methodological and structural improvements in recent editions of this report. More detailed information regarding the source and definition of core indicators have been provided for participating countries. Since June 2016, the Scoreboard data are available on the OECD.Stat website. Data on core indicators can be consulted, downloaded and put to further use, thereby addressing a longstanding demand to improve access to the data, and exposure of the publication to a wider audience. In addition, more information is provided on the uptake of financial instruments other than straight debt, and further endeavours will be undertaken in this area for future editions of the publication. Country profiles in the printed edition of this publication are abbreviated to two pages with key facts and the table with core indicators, while the full profiles remain available online. Finally, efforts are ongoing to increase the coverage of participating countries and to harmonise the data from already participating countries.
A summary of recommendations to further improve data collection and reporting of core indicators are outlined in Box 1 (see Annex A for a more detailed discussion), as well as in Chapter 1 of this publication. These are deemed necessary for countries to progress in the harmonisation of definitions and facilitate inter-temporal and cross-country analysis of trends in SME and entrepreneurship finance.
1. Improve reporting of SME loan variables by:
-
Systematically separating reporting of financial information for non-employer and employer-firms;
-
Providing both stock and flow data for SME loans;
-
Detailing the loans' composition, with indication of the different underlying products (e.g. overdrafts / lines of credit / leases / business mortgages or credit cards / securitised loans), and disclose such elements in the loan definition.
2. Fill gaps in available data and work towards more comprehensive information for other core indicators in the Scoreboard, including
-
Offer more comprehensive information on government programmes that ease SMEs’ access to finance.
-
Provide data on non-performing loans for SMEs and for large firms, the latter to be used as a benchmark.
-
Provide more comprehensive data on alternative sources of financing, including crowdfunding and business angel investments
-
Collect information on SME loan fees, in addition to interest applied on the loans.
-
Compile more complete information on the uptake and use of non-bank financing instruments, asset-based finance in particular.
-
Detail the definition of collateral and improve reporting, using demand-side surveys to compensate for lack of supply-side data.