Spain

Leaving no one behind: Spain’s approach and priorities

Spain has made an explicit commitment to leaving no one behind in its new Fifth Master Plan for Development Co-operation. According to Spain addressing leaving no one behind requires a differentiated, people-centred approach that adapts to the needs of different developing countries according to four fundamental variables: 1) levels of poverty; 2) human development; 3) inequality; and 4) vulnerability.

Spanish development co-operation strives to respect cross-cutting principles of human rights and fundamental freedoms, gender equality, respect for cultural diversity, and environmental sustainability. It also targets vulnerable populations in middle-income countries and reducing inequalities within developing countries. It uses indicators such as the Human Development Index, GDP per capita and the multidimensional poverty index as its evidence base for selecting countries and regions.

For Spain, applying a leave no one behind approach helps ensure that policies focus on excluded people, can increase efficiency in allocating resources, and enable a better understanding of the problems and challenges to inclusive development. A key challenge is managing potential trade-offs between reaching the furthest behind first, pressure to allocate funds efficiently to maximise impact, and the potentially higher cost of reaching the most vulnerable populations.

Financial flows from Spain to developing countries

Figure 39.1. Net resource flows to developing countries, 2006-16, Spain
picture

Note: Data on private grants are only available for 2012 and 2013. Data on private flows at market terms are not available for 2016. Data on officially export credits are not available for 2014. Data on other official flows are not available for 2006, 2008 and 2010.

 StatLink https://doi.org/10.1787/888933796452

Figure 39.2. Net ODA: Trends in volume and as a share of GNI, 2006-17, Spain
picture

P: preliminary data.

 StatLink https://doi.org/10.1787/888933796471

Spain’s performance against commitments for effective development co-operation

Table 39.1. Results of the 2016 Global Partnership monitoring round (updated), Spain

Spain

Alignment and ownership by partner country (%)

Predictability (%)

Transparency

Use of country-led results frameworks

Funding recorded in countries’ national budgets

Funding through countries’ systems

Untied ODA

Annual predictability

Medium-term predictability

Retrospective statistics (OECD CRS)

Information for forecasting (OECD FSS)

Publishing to IATI

2016

89.6%

88.7%

34.8%

82.1

87.0%

39.4%

needs improvement

needs improvement

needs improvement

Baseline

-

76.8%

69.1%

80.8

87.5%

39.3%

good

needs improvement

needs improvement

Trend

-

=

=

Note: Please refer to Annex B for details on the indicators. Data on untied ODA, retrospective statistics and publishing to the IATI have been updated according to the latest information available.

 StatLink https://doi.org/10.1787/888933797953

Spain’s official development assistance

In 2017, Spain provided USD 2.4 billion in net ODA (preliminary data), which represented 0.19% of gross national income (GNI) and a 44% decrease in real terms from 2016, after a significant rise in 2016 due to exceptional debt relief for Cuba. Spain is committed, at the EU level, to collectively achieve a 0.7% ODA/GNI ratio by 2030. In 2017, in-donor refugee costs were USD 218 million and represented 9% of Spain’s total net official development assistance (ODA), compared to 2.1% in 2016.

Spain’s share of untied ODA (excluding administrative costs and in-donor refugee costs) increased from 80.8% in 2015 to 81.7% in 2016, compared with the Development Assistance Committee (DAC) average of 81.2% in 2016. The grant element of total ODA was 100% in 2016. Loans amounted to 1.8% of gross ODA in 2016.

In 2016, 63% of Spain’s ODA was provided bilaterally. It allocated 37% of total ODA as core contributions to multilateral organisations. In addition, it channelled 4% of its bilateral ODA to specific projects implemented by multilateral organisations (multi-bi/non-core contributions).

Figure 39.3. ODA composition in 2010-16 and distribution of multilateral ODA in 2016, Spain
picture

 StatLink https://doi.org/10.1787/888933796490

In 2016, 7.3% of bilateral ODA was programmed with partner countries. Spain’s share of country programmable aid was lower than the DAC country average (46.8%). Debt relief accounted for 74% of gross bilateral aid.

Figure 39.4. Composition of bilateral ODA, 2016, gross disbursements, Spain
picture

 StatLink https://doi.org/10.1787/888933796509

In 2016, USD 321.2 million of bilateral ODA was channelled to and through civil society organisations (CSOs). Between 2015 and 2016, ODA channelled to and through CSOs fell as a share of bilateral aid (from 28.7% in 2015 to 11.2% in 2016).

Figure 39.5. Gross bilateral ODA disbursements to and through CSOs by type of CSO, 2010-16, Spain
picture

 StatLink https://doi.org/10.1787/888933796528

Bilateral ODA was primarily focused on Latin America and the Caribbean. In 2016, USD 2.3 billion was allocated to Latin America and the Caribbean and USD 91.5 million was allocated to sub-Saharan Africa.

Figure 39.6. Share of bilateral ODA by region, 2016, gross disbursements, Spain
picture

Note: Seven per cent of bilateral ODA allocated was unspecified by region in 2016. This share is not represented on the map.

 StatLink https://doi.org/10.1787/888933796547

In 2016, 82.2% of bilateral ODA went to Spain’s top 10 recipients. Spain reduced the number of its priority partner countries from 50 in 2012 to 23 in 2015 and 2016, focusing on three priority regions. Six of its top 10 recipients are priority partner countries. In 2016, its support to fragile contexts reached USD 183.9 million. Support to fragile contexts consisted mainly of project-type interventions (52%) and other in-donor expenditures (35%).

Figure 39.7. Bilateral ODA to top recipients, 2016, gross disbursements, Spain
picture

 StatLink https://doi.org/10.1787/888933796566

In 2016, 3% of bilateral ODA was allocated to least developed countries (LDCs), amounting to USD 85.7 million. This is a decrease from 11.4% in 2015 and is lower than the 2016 DAC average of 21.9%. Upper middle-income countries received the highest share of bilateral ODA in 2016 (80.2%).

At 0.04% of GNI in 2016, total ODA to the LDCs was below the UN target of 0.15% of GNI.

Figure 39.8. Bilateral ODA by income group, 2010-16, gross disbursements, Spain
picture

 StatLink https://doi.org/10.1787/888933796585

In 2016, 73% of bilateral ODA (USD 2.1 billion) was allocated to actions relating to debt. USD 256.2 million (8.6% of bilateral ODA) was allocated to social infrastructure and services, with strong focus on support to government and civil society (USD 95.4 million) and education (USD 57 million). Humanitarian aid amounted to USD 51.2 million. In 2016, Spain committed USD 40.1 million to promote aid for trade and to improve developing countries’ trade performance and integration into the world economy.

Figure 39.9. Share of gross bilateral ODA by sector, 2015-16, commitments, Spain
picture

 StatLink https://doi.org/10.1787/888933796604

USD 241.1 million of bilateral ODA supported gender equality. In 2016, 41.4% of Spanish bilateral allocable aid had gender equality and women’s empowerment as a principal or significant objective, above the DAC country average of 36.5%. This is up from 35.8% in 2015. A high share of Spain’s aid to population and reproductive health, health, and production focuses on gender.

Figure 39.10. Share of bilateral allocable ODA in support of gender equality by sector, 2016, commitments, Spain
picture

 StatLink https://doi.org/10.1787/888933796623

USD 154.8 million of Spain’s bilateral ODA supported the environment. In 2016, 26.6% of Spanish bilateral allocable aid supported the environment and 12.5% (USD 73 million) focused particularly on climate change, compared with the respective DAC country averages of 33% and 25.7%.

Figure 39.11. Bilateral allocable ODA in support of global and local environment objectives, 2010-16, commitments, Spain
picture

 StatLink https://doi.org/10.1787/888933796642

Note to reader: Annex B provides “Methodological notes on the profiles of Development Assistance Committee members”.

End of the section – Back to iLibrary publication page