copy the linklink copied!Annex E. Example of a project appraisal form

Measuring the environmental efficiency of an investment implies calculating the unit cost of decreasing, for example, PM2.5 emissions. The unit cost should be calculated as the difference between PM2.5 emissions from old diesel buses and from new buses. The calculation should use real emission factors from the model.

The best project receives 10 points, the worst 0 points; other projects receive points proportional to their position.

copy the linklink copied!

	Criteria	Weight	Max No. of points
A	Project preparation	0.1
1	Prepared business plan or strategic for project implementation in the city		0-1
B	Project location	0.2
1	Buses that will be replaced in polluted districts of cities		5
2	Buses that will be replaced are used only in the centre of the eligible city		5
3	Buses that will be replaced are used in the city centre and on the outskirts/suburbs of the eligible city		3
4	Buses that will be replaced are used in the city and connecting the rural area outside the eligible city		0
C	Project type	0.2
1	CNG-powered buses		10
2	Trolleybuses		5
3	LPG-powered buses		1
4	Modern diesel buses
D	Project size	0.2
1	More than 20 buses to be replaced		10
2	Between 10 and 20 buses to be replaced		5
3	Fewer than 10 buses to be replaced		1
E	Proposed system of improvements of urban public transport in the city:	0.1
1	Length of the new bus lanes (0 points < 2km, 1 p.– up to 2km, 2p. > 2km)		2
2	Number of traffic lights with priority for public transport (0 points < 2, 1 p.– up to 4, 2p. > 5)		2
3	Number of bus stops newly equipped with online information for passengers (0 points < 2, 1 p.– up to 4, 2p. > 5)		2
4	Number of new bus stops (0 points < 2, 1 p.– up to 4, 2p. > 5)		2
5	Other measures (points according to expert opinion)		2
F	Environmental efficiency	0.2
1	Unit efficiency	(F2-F3) /F4
2	Calculated annual PM2.5 emissions from old buses [PM2.5 kg]
3	Calculated annual PM2.5 emissions from new buses [PM2.5 kg]
4	Project costs
5	Points for environmental efficiency – the best project with unit efficiency U_best receives 10, the worst with unit efficiency U_worst receives 0, others with unit efficiency U receive 10*(U-U_worst)/ (U_best-U_worst)		10
G	Total: (weights x points)

Metadata, Legal and Rights

This document, as well as any data and map included herein, are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. Extracts from publications may be subject to additional disclaimers, which are set out in the complete version of the publication, available at the link provided.

https://doi.org/10.1787/b6b91b9a-en

The use of this work, whether digital or print, is governed by the Terms and Conditions to be found at http://www.oecd.org/termsandconditions.

╳

Green Finance and Investment: Promoting Clean Urban Public Transportation and Green Investment in Kyrgyzstan:

Do you want to open the publication page on OECD-ILIBRARY for more details on:

available formats

purchase of a print copy

or to publication metadata?

Cancel

Annex E. Example of a project appraisal form