copy the linklink copied!Côte d’Ivoire

copy the linklink copied!

Côte d’Ivoire has met all aspects of the terms of reference (OECD, 2017[3]) (ToR) for the calendar year 2018 (year in review) that can be met in the absence of rulings being issued.

In the prior year report, Côte d’Ivoire did not receive any recommendations.

Côte d’Ivoire does not issue any type of ruling within the scope of the transparency framework. Côte d’Ivoire only issues interpretative rulings. These tax rulings are not binding for the tax authorities and are therefore not considered rulings as defined in the Action 5 Report (OECD, 2015[5]). In the event that Côte d’Ivoire puts in place the administrative process to issue rulings within the scope of the transparency framework, Côte d’Ivoire notes that it would implement the transparency framework obligations.

As no exchanges were required to take place, no peer input was received in respect of the exchanges of information on rulings received from Côte d’Ivoire.

copy the linklink copied!Introduction

This peer review covers Côte d’Ivoire’s implementation of the BEPS Action 5 transparency framework for the year 2018. The report has four parts, each relating to a key part of the ToR. Each part is discussed in turn. A summary of recommendations is included at the end of this report.

copy the linklink copied!A. The information gathering process

As no rulings are issued, this section is not assessed.

copy the linklink copied!B. The exchange of information

As no rulings are issued, this section is not assessed.

copy the linklink copied!C. Statistics (ToR IV)

As no rulings are issued, no statistics can be reported.

copy the linklink copied!D. Matters related to intellectual property regimes (ToR I.4.1.3)

Côte d’Ivoire does not offer an intellectual property regime for which transparency requirements under the Action 5 Report (OECD, 2015[5]) were imposed.

copy the linklink copied!Summary of recommendations on implementation of the transparency framework

copy the linklink copied!

Aspect of implementation of the transparency framework that should be improved

Recommendation for improvement

No recommendations are made.

Metadata, Legal and Rights

This document, as well as any data and map included herein, are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. Extracts from publications may be subject to additional disclaimers, which are set out in the complete version of the publication, available at the link provided.

© OECD 2019

The use of this work, whether digital or print, is governed by the Terms and Conditions to be found at