Executive summary

Oil has provided Kuwait with wealth and well-being for the past 80 years. Slowing demand for oil is threatening the sustainability of the current economic and social model, emphasising the need to transition towards a knowledge-based society – where value creation, the resolution of societal challenges and the well-being of society at large will be based on the production, diffusion and implementation of knowledge.

“New Kuwait”, an overarching national development plan, proposes a vision of transforming Kuwait into a trading and finance hub, and a transition toward a knowledge-based society (“Smart Kuwait”) by 2035.

The OECD Review of Innovation Policy: Kuwait offers an overview of the main characteristics of the country’s innovation system and policy, the challenges it faces, and the way forward towards a knowledge-based society.

It is based on extensive evidence, including a background report coordinated the Kuwait Foundation for the Advancement of Science (KFAS), desk research of over 600 documents, and 4 in-country missions where 111 meetings were held with stakeholders from government, academia, businesses and civil society. In addition, results of a dedicated innovation and R&D survey on 2 326 companies were used, providing initial insights on the innovation and R&D behaviour of Kuwaiti businesses.

The Kuwaiti fledgling innovation system includes a moderately developed research sector, concentrated around Kuwait University (KU) and the Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research (KISR), with additional contributions provided by the Ministry of Health, the Dasman Diabetes Institute and private universities.

There is some scale of research activity in the oil sector, as well as the chemicals and food industries. Healthcare is the leading sector in services, and a pocket of excellence exists in the medical technology sector.

Overall spending on R&D is estimated at 0.33-0.37% of gross domestic product, less than half of the level realised in neighbouring Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, and less than a fifth of the 2% target set in the Blue Ribbon report in 2007.

There is no governmental body – ministry or agency – with a mandate for policy making in science, technology and innovation (STI), and no national strategy pertaining to STI. The strategies and research agenda of the two main research institutions (KU and KISR) are developed mainly bottom-up and their research budgets are negotiated directly with the Ministry of Finance, while the KFAS finances individual projects. In particular, the link towards the “New Kuwait” Development Plan remains tenuous.

As a corollary of this set-up, there is also no governmental funding body for research, or for innovation, and little or no financial instruments to support STI activities. A USD 6.6 billion National Fund for SMEs supports entrepreneurship, but does not specifically support innovation, and some of its rules are discouraging in particular for technology start-ups, such as the rule about exclusive Kuwaiti ownership of equity, which precludes attracting foreign talent through equity.

At the centre of Kuwait’s fledgling innovation system is KFAS, an institution that raises awareness, provides training grants for R&D projects in academia and business, and operates its own research centres.

Going forward, Kuwait requires a clear strategy of promoting STI as a major enabler of the transition towards the knowledge society. Such a strategy should be articulated around the policy challenges and priority actions listed in Table 1.


This work is published under the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of OECD member countries.

This document, as well as any data and map included herein, are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area.

Note by Turkey
The information in this document with reference to “Cyprus” relates to the southern part of the Island. There is no single authority representing both Turkish and Greek Cypriot people on the Island. Turkey recognises the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC). Until a lasting and equitable solution is found within the context of the United Nations, Turkey shall preserve its position concerning the “Cyprus issue”.

Note by all the European Union Member States of the OECD and the European Union
The Republic of Cyprus is recognised by all members of the United Nations with the exception of Turkey. The information in this document relates to the area under the effective control of the Government of the Republic of Cyprus.

Photo credits: Cover © Kuwait Foundation for the Advancement of Sciences.

Corrigenda to publications may be found on line at: www.oecd.org/about/publishing/corrigenda.htm.

© OECD 2021

The use of this work, whether digital or print, is governed by the Terms and Conditions to be found at http://www.oecd.org/termsandconditions.