International Regulatory Co-operation and Trade

Understanding the Trade Costs of Regulatory Divergence and the Remedies

image of International Regulatory Co-operation and Trade

Regulatory differences across jurisdictions can be costly for traders. While these costs may reflect variations in domestic conditions and preferences, they may also be the result of rule-making processes working in isolation and of a lack of consideration for the international environment. Thus, some of the trade costs of regulatory divergence may be avoided without compromising the quality of regulatory protection. Building on lessons learnt from OECD analytical work and the experiences of OECD countries in regulatory policy and trade, this report proposes a definition of trade costs of regulatory divergence and analyses various approaches to addressing them, including unilateral, bilateral and multilateral approaches. It focuses on the contribution of good regulatory practices, the adoption of international standards, and the use of cross-border recognition frameworks and trade agreements. Based on this, the report provides indications for policy makers on how to reduce trade costs through international regulatory co-operation.




Conclusion: Considerations to reduce trade costs through IRC

In conclusion, this chapter builds on the lessons learnt from the large range of OECD and other work underpinning this report to draw a list of considerations to reduce trade costs through IRC. It identifies the generic measures that countries can take that promote regulatory quality and trade and highlights the considerations that can drive the selection of specific IRC approaches.


This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error