1887

Flexibility and Proportionality in Corporate Governance

image of Flexibility and Proportionality in Corporate Governance

The quality of corporate governance regulations matters. If they are well designed, they can help governments achieve important policy objectives, such as higher levels of investment, increased productivity and better business sector dynamics. But for this to happen, the rules and regulations must be allowed to evolve over time. They must also be able to meet the many different needs of those entrepreneurs, investors and stakeholders who are supposed to implement them.

This is why the G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance state that policy makers have a responsibility to shape a regulatory framework that can meet the needs of corporations that operate under widely different circumstances.

Importantly, this concept of flexibility and proportionality is not about less demanding rules or the acceptance of sub-standard practices. On the contrary, it represents a functional and outcome oriented approach to regulation that facilitates implementation and makes enforcement more effective.

This OECD report presents the results of an OECD review on flexibility and proportionality practices in seven different areas of corporate governance regulation. The review covers 39 jurisdictions and six in-depth country case studies.

English

.

Foreword

This report presents the results of a set of thematic peer reviews based on the G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance. The theme of the reviews is the availability of flexibility and proportionality measures that can be used when implementing key areas of corporate governance regulation such as company law and securities regulation. The regulatory areas that are covered by the report are board composition, board committees and board member qualifications; say on pay and the detail of disclosure on remuneration; related party transactions; disclosure of periodic financial information and ad-hoc information; disclosure of major shareholdings; takeovers, and pre-emptive rights. The report covers 39 jurisdictions and in-depth case studies of Italy, Japan, Portugal, Sweden, the United Kingdom and the United States.

English

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error