Flexibility and Proportionality in Corporate Governance
The quality of corporate governance regulations matters. If they are well designed, they can help governments achieve important policy objectives, such as higher levels of investment, increased productivity and better business sector dynamics. But for this to happen, the rules and regulations must be allowed to evolve over time. They must also be able to meet the many different needs of those entrepreneurs, investors and stakeholders who are supposed to implement them.
This is why the G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance state that policy makers have a responsibility to shape a regulatory framework that can meet the needs of corporations that operate under widely different circumstances.
Importantly, this concept of flexibility and proportionality is not about less demanding rules or the acceptance of sub-standard practices. On the contrary, it represents a functional and outcome oriented approach to regulation that facilitates implementation and makes enforcement more effective.
This OECD report presents the results of an OECD review on flexibility and proportionality practices in seven different areas of corporate governance regulation. The review covers 39 jurisdictions and six in-depth country case studies.
Board composition, board committees and board member qualifications
This chapter presents the results of the review in the area of board composition, board committees and board member qualifications. It takes stock of the criteria and mechanisms that may motivate and allow flexibility and proportionality in the implementation of rules and regulations relating to the area across the 39 jurisdictions that responded the survey used for the reviews. It also includes a case study of the British corporate governance framework in the area submitted by Widad Chhibi and Ilaria Miller from the UK Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS).
- Click to access:
-
Click to download PDF - 4.24MBPDF