Socio-economic costs of continuing the status-quo of mercury pollution

image of Socio-economic costs of continuing the status-quo of mercury pollution

Mercury is considered a global pollutant and it has been concluded that a significant portion of humans and wildlife throughout the world are exposed to methyl mercury at levels of concern. The Governing Council of UNEP has concluded that long-term international action is required. Most of the measures needed to reduce emissions will lead to costs to society. However, mercury pollution also results in costs to society including for example damage costs from negative impacts on human health and the environment, loss of income from reduced commercial fisheries, administrative costs for scientific research and development, control and risk communication. The aim of this report is to present an estimate of the socio-economic costs of continued mercury contamination of the environment as an input to the global considerations on what international long-term action should be taken. The study contains an analysis of the damage costs of continuing mercury pollution without any further measures until 2020. The analysis has mainly focussed on IQ losses due to the exposure to methyl mercury via ingestion of contaminated fish. Other human health, social and environmental damages are also discussed as are costs of controlling mercury emissions. Furthermore, societal benefits of reducing mercury emissions are presented for two emission reduction scenarios.



Definitions of EXEC and MFTR Scenarios for by-product sources

The type and efficiency of technological and non-technological measures to reduce emissions of mercury from sources are reviewed in the UNEPCBA project (Pacyna et al., 2008). A number of technical and nontechnical measures are available for reducing the Hg emissions from: i) anthropogenic sources where Hg is a by-product (e.g. power plants, smelters, cement kilns, other industrial plants), ii) various uses, and iii) waste disposal. These measures differ with regard to emission control efficiency, costs, and environmental benefits obtained through their implementation. Very often Hg emissions are substantially reduced by equipment employed to reduce emissions of other pollutants. The best example is the reduction of Hg emissions by the flue gas desulfurization (FGD) installations. Removal efficiency of FGD installations for mercury ranges from 30 to 50%. The same applies to de-NOx installations, and control devices reducing emissions of fine particles.


This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error