1887

Nordic Economic Policy Review

Challenges in health care financing and provision

image of Nordic Economic Policy Review

The Nordic Economic Policy Review is published by the Nordic Council of Ministers and addresses policy issues in a way that is useful for in-formed non-specialists as well as for professional economists. All articles are commissioned from leading professional economists and are subject to peer review prior to publication. The review appears twice a year. Content: Challenges in health care financing and provision - Tor Iversen and Sverre A.C. Kittelsen Ageing populations: More care or just later care? - Terkel Christiansen, Jørgen Lauridsen and Mickael Bech Comment by Anna Lilja Gunnarsdottir Lifestyle, health and costs – what does available evidence suggest? - Kristian Bolin Comment by Tinna Laufey Ásgeirsdóttir The economics of long-term care: A survey - Helmuth Cremer, Pierre Pestieau and Gregory Ponthiere Comment by Þórólfur Matthíasson The role of primary health care in controlling the cost of specialist health care - Stephen Beales and Peter C. Smith Comment by Helgi Tómasson Payments in support of effective primary care for chronic conditions - Randall P. Ellis and Arlene S. Ash Comment by Jørgen T. Lauridsen An economic assessment of price rationing versus non-price rationing of health care - Luigi Siciliani Comment by Mickael Bech Should pharmaceutical costs be curbed? - Kurt R. Brekke, Dag Morten Dalen and Steinar Strøm Comment by Helgi Tómasson Productivity differences in Nordic hospitals: Can we learn from Finland? - Clas Rehnberg and Unto Häkkinen Comment by Thorvaldur Gylfason

English

.

Productivity differences in Nordic hospitals: Can we learn from Finland?

Acute short-term hospitals are the major resource user in the health care sector and play a significant role for advanced treatment. This paper presents the findings from a Nordic collaboration where the productivity differences across acute hospitals have been measured and compared. The results suggest that there was a markedly higher average hospital productivity in Finland as compared to Denmark, Norway and Sweden. The explanations of findings are discussed along different theories and possible reasons for the observed differences. The findings do not seem to be explained by differences in the use of market mechanisms and reimbursement systems. The paper argues for a closer analysis of the impact of fund-holding, contractual relations and incentives between levels of public governments as well as including quality indicators in the efficiency measure.

English

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error