1887

Fragile States

Resource Flows and Trends

image of Fragile States

By 2015, half of the world’s people living on less than USD 1.25 a day will be in fragile states. While poverty has decreased globally, progress on Millennium Development Goal (MDG) 1 is slower in fragile states than in other developing countries. Fragile states are also off-track to meet the rest of the MDGs by 2015.

Fragile situations became a central concern of the international development and security agenda in the 1990s. Since then, powerful forces have been influencing the causes and manifestations of fragility, including the combination of democratic aspirations, new technologies, demographic shifts and climate change. The last five years have been especially tumultuous, encompassing the 2008 food, fuel and financial crisis and the Arab Spring, which began in 2011.

These events have influenced the international debate on the nature, relevance and implications of fragility. While situations of fragility clearly have common elements – including poverty, inequality and vulnerability – how can we make sense of the great diversity in their national income, endowment in natural resources or historical trajectories? How do we move towards a more substantive concept of fragility that goes beyond a primary focus on the quality of government policies and institutions to include a broader picture of the economy and society? This publication takes stock of i) the evolution of fragility as a concept, ii) analyses of financial flows to and within fragile states between 2000 and 2010, and iii) trends and issues that are likely to shape fragility in the years to come.

English

.

Financial flows in fragile states

ODA and philanthropic giving to fragile states has continued to grow, just as the multi-pronged engagement (development, trade and investment) of rising powers accelerated. ODA to fragile states reached USD 50 billion, or 38% of total ODA, in 2010. It represents the biggest financial inflow, followed by remittances and foreign direct investment (FDI). However, half of all ODA to fragile states goes to only seven “donor darlings”, and remains very volatile: every fragile state has had at least one aid shock in the past 10 years. As for private sector inflows, there remains significant scope for leveraging ODA and remittances to increase them. Three-quarters of FDI to fragile states going to just seven countries, all resourcerich. Again with the exception of resource-rich countries, they are increasingly locked out from international trade. Overall, fragile states are far from realising their tax potential.

English

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error