An Atlas of the Sahara-Sahel
Geography, Economics and Security

The Sahara-Sahel has seen recurrent episodes of instability. However, the recent Libyan and Malian crises have intensified the level of violence. These episodes have restructured the geopolitical and geographical dynamics of the region. Cross-border or regional, these contemporary crises require new institutional responses. How can countries sharing this space - Algeria, Libya, Mali, Morocco, Mauritania, Niger, Chad and Tunisia and all related states such as Nigeria - stabilize and develop?
Historically, the Sahara plays an intermediary role between North Africa and sub-Saharan Africa. Commercial and human exchanges are intense and based on social networks that now include trafficking. Understanding their structure, geographical and organizational mobility of criminal groups and migratory movements represents a strategic challenge. This book hopes to address this challenge and stimulate strategies for the Sahel of the European Union, the United Nations, the African Union or ECOWAS (Economic Community of the States of West Africa) in order to foster lasting peace.
The Atlas is based on an analysis of mapped regional security issues and development objectives to open the necessary dialogue between regional and international organizations, governments, researchers and local stakeholders tracks.
Also available in: French
- Click to access:
-
Click to download PDF - 29.72MBPDF
-
Click to Read online and shareREAD
Executive Summary
Sahel and West Africa Club
To understand the Sahara-Sahel based on social, economic and spatial mobility can help bring together its two sides and reactivate an area of mobility currently seen as segmented. The main element of this approach lies in moving beyond two contradictory ways of thinking about space: as production or as movement. According to the former, bioclimatic zones (which determine production) dominate geographic understanding of the area. In this view, the 200 mm annual precipitation isohyet is defined as the cut-off for aridity, below which farming and herding are no longer possible. Yet this approach obscures the reality of these areas, characterised by trade, complementarity and movement. According to the latter, a spatial understanding based on movement or routes sheds light on other opportunities for socio-economic ties and the vitality of networks.
Also available in: French
- Click to access:
-
Click to download PDF - 249.03KBPDF
-
Click to Read online and shareREAD