Options for Regulatory Processes and Procedures in Telecommunications
Hide / Show Abstract

Options for Regulatory Processes and Procedures in Telecommunications

The Report's purpose is to illuminate the alternatives that exist for national telecommunications regulation and to analyse the advantages and disadvantages of these various options. The Regulatory Colloquium itself, and the preparation of the Briefing Report, were funded by the New ITU Association of Japan. The principal authors are Michael Tyler and Susan Bednarczyk. The views expressed are those of the authors alone.

Click to Access: 
    http://oecd.metastore.ingenta.com/content/pub-800c7e19-en.pdf
  • PDF
  • http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/science-and-technology/options-for-regulatory-processes-and-procedures-in-telecommunications_pub/800c7e19-en
  • READ
 
Chapter
 

Conclusions: alternatives for the regulatory structure and process You do not have access to this content

English
Click to Access: 
    http://oecd.metastore.ingenta.com/content/pub-800c7e19-c2927bab-en.pdf
  • PDF
  • http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/science-and-technology/options-for-regulatory-processes-and-procedures-in-telecommunications_pub/800c7e19-c2927bab-en
  • READ
Author(s):
ITU

Hide / Show Abstract

The conclusions of this report can best be summarised by a brief restatement of the main options and alternatives involved in the design or redesign of regulatory institutions and processes in telecommunications. In order not to duplicate the Executive Summary, the alternatives are stated very briefly, and we do not repeat most of the earlier discussion of their advantages and disadvantages. A few highlights are, however, retained.