OECD Journal on Budgeting

Frequency
3 times a year
ISSN: 
1681-2336 (online)
ISSN: 
1608-7143 (print)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/16812336
Hide / Show Abstract

The OECD journal on public sector budgeting, published three times per year. It draws on the best of the recent work of the OECD Working Party of Senior Budget Officials (SBO), as well as special contributions from finance ministries, and makes it available to a wider community in an accessible format. The journal provides insight on leading-edge institutional arrangements, systems and instruments for the allocation and management of resources in the public sector. Now published as a part of the OECD Journal subscription package.

Also available in French
Article
 

Economic and fiscal management under the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) administration You do not have access to this content

English
 
Click to Access: 
    http://oecd.metastore.ingenta.com/content/4214221ec001.pdf
  • PDF
  • http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/governance/economic-and-fiscal-management-under-the-democratic-party-of-japan-dpj-administration_budget-14-5jxv7kmxbkhf
  • READ
Author(s):
Hideaki Tanaka
22 Dec 2014
Pages:
25
Bibliographic information
No.:
1,
Volume:
14,
Issue:
1
Pages:
9–33
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/budget-14-5jxv7kmxbkhf

Hide / Show Abstract

Japan experienced a major change of government in September 2009. It was a remarkable political event, because Japanese politics was dominated by the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) in almost all the years following the end of World War ll. The new coalition government led by the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) tried to overhaul and restructure public administration and policy making in order to strengthen political leadership. In particular, they wanted to reform budgetary institutions as they fully recognised the LDP governments’ wasted public money that brought about huge fiscal deficits. They introduced new medium-term fiscal targets and planning, programme reviews, and tax expenditure report, and legislated laws to increase the rate of consumption tax from 5% to 10%. However their reforms were not successful as expected and ended in larger fiscal deficits. This paper analyses the economic and fiscal management of the DPJ Administration and why they couldn’t succeed in reforming budgetary institutions.

 
Visit the OECD web site