Nuclear Safety

Agence pour l'Energie Nucléaire

ISSN :
1990-1577 (en ligne)
ISSN :
1990-1585 (imprimé)
DOI :
10.1787/19901577
Cacher / Voir l'abstract

A series of publications from the Nuclear Energy Agency on various aspects of nuclear safety. In some cases they are conference proceedings and in other cases analytical reports.

Egalement disponible en: Français
 
The Safety of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle - Third Edition

Dernière édition

The Safety of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle - Third Edition You do not have access to this content

Anglais
Cliquez pour accéder: 
Auteur(s):
OCDE, AEN
Date de publication :
15 nov 2005
Pages :
321
ISBN :
9789264014220 (PDF) ; 9789264014213 (imprimé)
DOI :
10.1787/9789264014220-en

Cacher / Voir l'abstract

The procurement and preparation of fuel for nuclear power reactors, followed by its recovery, processing and management subsequent to reactor discharge, are frequently referred to as the nuclear fuel cycle. The facilities associated with these activities have an extensive and well-documented safety record accumulated over the past 50 years by technical experts and safety authorities. This third edition of The Safety of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle presents an up-to-date analysis of the safety aspects of the nuclear fuel cycle.

Egalement disponible en: Français

Ouvrir / Fermer Cacher / Voir les abstracts Table des matières

  • Sélectionner Cliquez pour accéder
  • Cliquez pour accéder:  Introduction and Executive Summary
  • Cliquez pour accéder:  The Nuclear Fuel Cycle
  • Cliquez pour accéder:  Safety Principles
    This chapter gives an overall picture of the philosophy that is adopted to ensure high standards of safety in the fuel cycle. All nuclear fuel cycle facilities are subject to regulatory control that requires installations to be designed, constructed, commissioned, operated, and decommissioned with due regard to the safety of workers and to the general public.
  • Cliquez pour accéder:  General Safety
    This chapter contains a discussion of the general safety matters associated with the fuel cycle, including hazards of both radiological and non-radiological nature.
    Malevolent actions can be oriented towards nuclear fuel cycle facilities or radioactive matters transportation, the same way as they could be oriented towards any other dangerous product, activity or facility such as chemical or explosives factories. Protective measures against such actions are not specific to nuclear facilities, they are dealt with by specialists and their details are kept confidential.
  • Cliquez pour accéder:  Safety of the Front End of the Fuel Cycle
    The mining and milling of uranium do not have the same level of potential safety problems that are associated with operation of nuclear reactors and other fuel cycle facilities. The uranium mines do have the same safety and environmental issues as other mines in addition to the precautions required to deal with the radioactivity of the ore.
  • Cliquez pour accéder:  Safety of the Spent Fuel Storage
    Several technologies are being used for the storage of spent fuel at reactor (AR) sites and at sites away from reactors (AFR) (Figure 6.1). Both wet (pool) storage facilities and dry storage facilities (buildings and containers) are used on a commercial scale.
  • Cliquez pour accéder:  Safety of Fuel Reprocessing
    Spent fuel from NPP has been reprocessed on an industrial scale for about 40 years, by separating the recyclable fissile material from the unusable fission products contained with them. The separation technique generally adopted is liquid-liquid extraction, using nitric acid for the aqueous phase and tributyl phosphate (TBP) for the solvent of the organic phase, following the PUREX process.
  • Cliquez pour accéder:  Safety of the Management of Radioactive Waste
    The management of radioactive waste requires the adoption of a certain number of policies and practices that share a common objective: the handling, interim storage, and disposal of radioactive waste with every necessary safety precaution to prevent any undue radiation of people or contamination of the environment over both the short and the long term.
  • Cliquez pour accéder:  Safety of On-Site Waste Storage
    Vitrified waste must be stored during the period between solidification and their disposal. This period can last up to several decades, mainly to enable the level of activity and the production of heat to decrease to suitable levels for disposal.
  • Cliquez pour accéder:  Safety of Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities
    Decommissioning is the final stage in the life-cycle of a nuclear facility. The final act of shutting down the facility should be to remove the radioactive materials in process and the radioactive waste from normal operations. Subsequently, during decommissioning, the remaining radioactivity must be safely removed from the facility through decontamination and dismantling, so that the facility can be demolished, or refurbished for re-use.
  • Cliquez pour accéder:  Safety of the Transport of Radioactive Materials
    Specific safety regulations are well-developed and harmonised internationally. Accident situations have been taken into account from the beginning and the transport regulations are framed so that unacceptable radiation exposures should not occur from either radioactivity release or shielding loss even in the case of severe accidents. Actual packages are designed to remain safe in the specified regulatory conditions of rain, stacking, collision, fire, and immersion.
  • Cliquez pour accéder:  Safety Records of Fuel Cycle Facilities
    Collective dose, when provided hereafter for an individual facility, may vary considerably from year to year, depending on many parameters. Its general trend is provided as an indicator of the radiation protection efficiency, that is to say the ability of the operator to control radiation spread through efficient operation and maintenance. It should not be used in such case as an health indicator.
  • Cliquez pour accéder:  Main Conclusions

    The decade since the previous edition of this report (last issued in 1993) has been a period of relative stability, with no important increase in the number of nuclear power plants. The main reason is the past overestimation of needs, which led to general overcapacity. Political considerations based on public acceptance problems have certainly also been an aggravating factor.

  • Cliquez pour accéder:  Appendix 1
  • Ajouter à ma sélection