Effective Carbon Prices
Hide / Show Abstract

Effective Carbon Prices

Economic textbooks predict that taxes and emission trading systems are the cheapest way for societies to reduce emissions of CO2. This book shows that this is also the case in the real world. It estimates the costs to society of reducing CO2 emissions in 15 countries using a broad range of policy instruments in 5 of the sectors that generate most emissions: electricity generation, road transport, pulp & paper and cement, as well as households’ domestic energy use. It finds wide variations in the costs of abating each tonne of CO2 within and among countries, as well as in the sectors examined and across different types of policy instruments. Market-based approaches like taxes and trading systems consistently reduced CO2 at a lower cost than other instruments. Capital subsidies and feed-in tariffs were among the most expensive ways of reducing emissions.

Click to Access: 
    http://oecd.metastore.ingenta.com/content/9713081e.pdf
  • PDF
  • http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/environment/effective-carbon-prices_9789264196964-en
  • READ
 
Chapter
 

Foreword You do not have access to this content

English
Click to Access: 
    http://oecd.metastore.ingenta.com/content/9713081ec001.pdf
  • PDF
  • http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/environment/effective-carbon-prices/foreword_9789264196964-1-en
  • READ
Author(s):
OECD

Hide / Show Abstract

Comparisons of the effective price put on carbon by policies in different sectors and countries provide valuable insights into the cost-effectiveness of alternative policies to reduce greenhouse emissions (GHGs), and their potential impacts on competiveness. The value of this type of analysis was demonstrated by a report, published in May 2011 by the Australian Productivity Commission, entitled Carbon Emission Policies in Key Economies. The analysis presented in that report had a major impact on that country’s decision to introduce an explicit carbon pricing system on 1 July 2012.

Also available in French
 
Visit the OECD web site