OECD Education Working Papers

ISSN :
1993-9019 (online)
DOI :
10.1787/19939019
Hide / Show Abstract
This series is designed to make available to a wider readership selected studies drawing on the work of the OECD Directorate for Education. Authorship is usually collective, but principal writers are named. The papers are generally available only in their original language (English or French) with a short summary available in the other.
 

School Accountability, Autonomy, Choice, and the Equity of Student Achievement

International Evidence from PISA 2003 You or your institution have access to this content

Click to Access: 
    http://oecd.metastore.ingenta.com/content/5kzsnsdbxxmn.pdf
  • PDF
  • http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/education/school-accountability-autonomy-choice-and-the-equity-of-student-achievement_246374511832
  • READ
Author(s):
Gabriela Schütz1, Martin R. West2, Ludger Wöbmann1
Author Affiliations
  • 1: Ifo Institute for Economic Research,University of Munich, Germany

  • 2: Brown university, Providence,RI., United States

Publication Date
21 Dec 2007
Bibliographic information
No.:
14
Pages
56
DOI
10.1787/246374511832

Hide / Show Abstract

School systems aspire to provide equal opportunity for all, irrespective of socio-economic status (SES). Much of the criticism of recent school reforms that introduce accountability, autonomy, and choice emphasizes their potentially negative consequences for equity. This report provides new evidence on how national features of accountability, autonomy, and choice are related to the equality of opportunity across countries. We estimate whether student achievement depends more or less on SES in school systems employing these institutional features. The rigorous micro-econometric analyses are based on the PISA 2003 data for more than 180,000 students from 27 OECD countries. The main empirical result is that rather than harming disadvantaged students, accountability, autonomy, and choice appear to be tides that lift all boats. The additional choice created by public funding for private schools in particular is associated with a strong reduction in the dependence of student achievement on SES. External exit exams have a strong positive effect for all students that is slightly smaller for low-SES students. The positive effect of regularly using subjective teacher ratings to assess students is substantially larger for low-SES students. The effect of many other accountability devices does not differ significantly by student SES. School autonomy in determining course content is associated with higher equality of opportunity, while equality of opportunity is lower in countries where more schools have autonomy in hiring teachers. Autonomy in formulating the budget and in establishing starting salaries is not associated with the equity of student outcomes. Inequality of opportunity is substantially higher in school systems that track students at early ages.