Journal of Business Cycle Measurement and Analysis

Frequency
3 times a year
ISSN: 
1729-3626 (online)
ISSN: 
1729-3618 (print)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/17293626
Hide / Show Abstract

The Journal of Business Cycle Measurement and Analysis has been discontinued as of 24 June 2016. This journal was published jointly with CIRET from 2004 to 2015. For more information see www.ciret.org/jbcy.

Related titles placeholder
Article
 

Revision of National Accounts

Swedish Expenditure Accounts and GDP You do not have access to this content

English
 
Click to Access: 
    http://oecd.metastore.ingenta.com/content/3304031ec005.pdf
  • PDF
  • http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/economics/revision-of-national-accounts_jbcma-v2004-art19-en
  • READ
Author(s):
Lars-Erik Öller, Karl-Gustav Hansson
24 Jan 2005
Pages:
23
Bibliographic information
No.:
19,
Volume:
2004,
Issue:
3
Pages:
363–385
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/jbcma-v2004-art19-en

Hide / Show Abstract

This paper studies the revisions of the expenditure approach variables of the National Accounts, the most popular tool in macroeconomic forecasting and analysis. Preliminary figures get most attention. But how reliable are they? Generally, preliminary figures underestimate growth rates. Some revision distributions are significantly non-normal, being leptokurtic, which translates to frequent outliers. The dispersion of the revisions of some variables is so large that the general usefulness of these variables can seriously be questioned. For many variables, revisions are correlated with the business cycle, i.e. growth rates are revised upwards in upturns and downwards in downturns. Plausible reasons are: biased imputation rules, prudent judgment and a sampling problem. Opposite signs and indications of acceleration/deceleration of preliminary and final figures are recorded and discussed. Different seasonal patterns further emphasize the incongruence between preliminary and final data. This may have serious consequences when analyzing seasonally adjusted data. Consistency of vintages would require cointegration and a common stochastic trend, but none was found on any frequency. A "final" figure may be substantially revised years later. The "latest" long-range growth is different from final and preliminary growth rates. These later revisions are primarily due to new classification rules. An international comparison completes the study. Positive bias appears in many countries’ GDP revisions. Correlation with the business cycle is common among European countries. In the conclusions, some proposals are given on how to improve the usefulness of preliminary data.

 
Visit the OECD web site