OECD Papers

1681-2328 (online)
1609-1914 (print)
Hide / Show Abstract

OECD Papers provides access to a collection of substantive papers not published as books or articles in other OECD series or journals. All subjects are covered, from the latest OECD research on macroeconomics and economic policies, to work in areas as varied as employment, education, environment, trade, science and technology, development and taxation. OECD Papers are available on a subscription basis. Now a part of the OECD Journal

Also available in French

Volume 6, Issue 8 You do not have access to this content

Hide / Show all Abstracts Articles

Mark Mark Date TitleClick to Access
  25 Oct 2006
Click to Access: 
  • PDF
Analytical Framework for Evaluating the Costs and Benefits of Extended Producer Responsibility Programmes
Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) is an environmental policy approach under which the responsibility of producers for their products is extended to include the social costs of waste management, including the environmental impact of waste disposal. This paper sets out a framework for assessing the costs and benefits of EPR. As compared
with "conventional" waste management EPR involves the collection of particular end-of-life products, product categories or waste streams. In some cases these wastes would traditionally be handled appropriately through municipal waste management programs. Packaging would be one example. In other cases they might be handled, or might need to be handled, as special wastes which would be inappropriate for a municipal waste management programme. Solvents, scrap tires, used crankcase oil, lead acid batteries and electronics fit into this category. To evaluate the costs and benefit ratio for EPR programmes, the costs of these features need to be weighed against the benefits in terms of the reduced social costs of waste management, including the various externalities associated with landfilling or incineration and the environmental risks associated with "doing nothing" by maintaining existing practices.
As compared with alternative policy instruments, an attraction of EPR is the incentive it creates for producers to consider post-consumer waste-management costs when making decisions about product design and marketing. Such "Design-for-Environment" incentives are an important part of the overall assessment of EPR, but their practical
evaluation could be difficult.
  25 Oct 2006
Click to Access: 
  • PDF
Impacts of Unit-based Waste Collection Charges
This report explores the costs and benefits of systems for charging householders for waste. The study looks only at charges which vary with the amount and characteristics of the waste collected, referred to in the report as differential and variable rate, or DVR, charging systems. It is not concerned with taxes or charges levied on householders which
do not vary according to how the waste collection services are used. The study uses a cost-benefit approach to attempt to draw out whether the balance of effects of such systems is positive or negative...
Add to Marked List
Visit the OECD web site