OECD Statistics Working Papers

ISSN :
1815-2031 (online)
DOI :
10.1787/18152031
Hide / Show Abstract

The OECD Statistics Working Paper Series - managed by the OECD Statistics Directorate – is designed to make available in a timely fashion and to a wider readership selected studies prepared by staff in the Secretariat or by outside consultants working on OECD projects. The papers included are of a technical, methodological or statistical policy nature and relate to statistical work relevant to the organisation. The Working Papers are generally available only in their original language - English or French - with a summary in the other.

Joint Working Paper
Measuring Well-being and Progress in Countries at Different Stages of Development: Towards a More Universal Conceptual Framework (with OECD Development Centre)

 

Indicators of "Societal Progress"

Lessons from International Experiences You or your institution have access to this content

Click to Access: 
    http://oecd.metastore.ingenta.com/content/5km4k7mq49jg.pdf
  • PDF
  • http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/economics/indicators-of-societal-progress_5km4k7mq49jg-en
  • READ
Author(s):
Katherine Scrivens1, Barbara Iasiello1
Author Affiliations
  • 1: OECD, France

Publication Date
30 June 2010
Bibliographic information
No:
2010/04
Pages
67
DOI
10.1787/5km4k7mq49jg-en

Hide / Show Abstract

This paper looks at different experiences in the development and use of societal progress indicator sets – at the European, national and sub-national level – with the aim of identifying useful lessons from these experiences. Five case studies are presented: the indicators used to support the EU ?Lisbon Strategy?; the UK Sustainable Development indicators; Measures of Australia?s Progress; Measuring Ireland?s Progress; and an example of a local community indicator initiative – the Santa Cruz Community Assessment Programme, in California. The paper concludes that for societal progress indicators to be used and applied in decision-making processes, then three conditions need to be met. First, the indicators should be seen as legitimate by the intended users. Second, the indicators should be set within a wider system that provides =fit-for-purpose‘ information. Third, an appropriate incentive structure must be in place for stakeholders to act on that information.