OECD Journal on Development

Discontinued
Frequency :
Quarterly
ISSN :
1996-580X (online)
ISSN :
1816-8124 (print)
DOI :
10.1787/1996580x
Hide / Show Abstract

The journal of the OECD Development Assistance Committee that includes reports on the DAC’s reviews of member country’s development co-operation policies, as well as analytical reports on various development issues.  The first issue of the year always presents the DAC Chairman’s annual Development Co-operation Report.

Also available in: French
 
 
 

Volume 3, Issue 4 You do not have access to this content

Publication Date :
22 Apr 2003
DOI :
10.1787/journal_dev-v3-4-en
Also available in: French

Hide / Show all Abstracts Articles

Mark Mark Date TitleClick to Access
  22 Apr 2003 Click to Access: 
    http://oecd.metastore.ingenta.com/content/4302341ec002.pdf
  • PDF
  • http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/development/development-co-operation-review-of-the-united-states_journal_dev-v3-art25-en
  • READ
Development Co-operation Review of The United States
OECD

The United States has a substantial impact on promoting economic growth and reducing poverty in developing countries due to the large size of its economy, its ability to influence world opinion and action and its weight within the international donor community. In 2001 the United States was the largest donor in the OECD’s Development Assistance Committee (DAC) in volume terms, reporting net official development assistance (ODA) of USD 10.9 billion, more than one-fifth of the DAC total. This represented 0.11% of its gross national income (GNI), the lowest ODA/GNI ratio in the DAC and below the DAC average country effort of 0.40%. President Bush recently announced a bold new proposal, the "Millennium Challenge Account" (MCA) for an additional USD 5 billion annually by 2006. If approved by Congress, the MCA will consolidate the American position as the largest donor, and slightly improve the country’s ODA/GNI performance. The American "checks and balances" system of government has some important ramifications for United States development co-operation. This approach implicates a wide range of stakeholders in budget decision-making, especially through the Congress. Flexible approaches to compromise are standard features of the American system, especially for issues of a short-term nature that respond to national or special interests. Addressing long-term issues related to development co-operation can prove more difficult because they lack urgency or a sufficiently strong and influential domestic constituency. Several of the issues raised in the 1998 DAC Peer Review are being addressed by the current Administration. However, some important development issues, including those relating to Congress, to the basic structure of American aid administration, or to the promotion of policy coherence for development, have proven more resistant to change and are noted again in this review...

  22 Apr 2003 Click to Access: 
    http://oecd.metastore.ingenta.com/content/4302341ec003.pdf
  • PDF
  • http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/development/development-co-operation-review-of-canada_journal_dev-v3-art26-en
  • READ
Development Co-operation Review of Canada
OECD

The last Development Assistance Committee (DAC) Review of Canada’s development co-operation, held in January 1998, highlighted Canada’s special ability to help lead the international community towards action which pushes out the frontiers of international co-operation. At the same time it noted that, in the context of a fundamental fiscal adjustment to respond to its domestic public debt burden, Canada’s aid budget had been cut by 29% over six years, more than in any other area of Canadian public spending. As a result, Canada’s official development assistance effort (as measured by the ODA/GNI ratio) had declined steeply from 0.45% at the beginning of the 1990s and was projected to fall below 0.30% by the end of the decade. (In fact, partly reflecting fast growth in Canada’s gross national income (GNI), the ODA/GNI ratio fell to 0.25% in 2000 and 0.22% in 2001). The DAC pointed out that these trends had created a paradox at the heart of Canada’s internationalism, given the continuing determination to be involved in a very wide range of issues and with as wide a range of partners as possible. This paradox raised concerns about Canada’s ability to meet expectations, both at home and abroad, for its role in the world...

  22 Apr 2003 Click to Access: 
    http://oecd.metastore.ingenta.com/content/4302341ec004.pdf
  • PDF
  • http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/development/papers-on-official-development-assistance-oda_journal_dev-v3-art27-en
  • READ
Papers on Official Development Assistance (ODA)
OECD

When large-scale aid programmes to developing countries began in the 1950s and 1960s, new concepts and definitions were required to measure and compare donors’ efforts. One of the key contributions of the Development Assistance Committee was to codify the notion of foreign aid under the name "official development assistance" (ODA). The DAC developed the ODA definition in the late 1960s and gave it its final form in 1972. The documents below discuss what the definition means in practice, which countries are eligible for ODA, and what progress donors have made towards achieving the UN target for ODA of 0.7% of their national income...

Add to Marked List